Sunday, April 2, 2017

Mistaken Location of Pilosocereus robinii



The United States Fish & Wildlife Service Mistaken Location of the Endangered Pilosocereus robinii, Key Tree Cactus

Overview
As a young naïve, recently graduated, graduate student, I was excited about going out and working helping to save endangered species. Since then I’ve worked to try to do such a task. During the course of that work I contacted many employees who work in agencies directly responsible for endangered species programs. Some are very nice and they did the best they could to help me. Others are very rude and are verbally abusive. I have had multiple cases of both. Some of my questions still haven’t been answered. This is years later.

First I want to say if you want to help endangered species you are in for a horrible, frustrating road.

Second I suggest you document everything.

For my research I needed data from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service. During my search I found an error by the “Service,” as they call themselves. I’ve found these things before. I’ve ignored them before. So I thought, well let me tell someone so maybe they will fix it. I’ve told people before, and the results varied. From those past times, I learned I need to document stuff.

My research took the state location of where species are found. Through the service website, I obtained this information as is available for any school student with interest in such a topic. Pilosocereus robinii, the Key Tree Cactus, was shown to be in Florida and California. To this day I guess “Key” in the common name comes from the Florida Keys. Anyway, California and Florida are far apart. How is an endangered plant rare yet found on different coasts? I then researched more into this question by reading the available recovery plan and status reviews. The researched did not provide evidence for California. I concluded it as an error, the plant is NOT found in California. Funny the website map for the species didn’t even show Florida, rather it focused on California completely omitting the species range.

I documented the mistake so that I could explain the problem to a service employee. That was my original rational for why I still have the following information. I saved the website view as a PDF, that PDF is pictured below. Take note that the species is believed to occur in California (red circle) and that Florida wasn’t even pictured (part of circle because Florida wasn’t available).



I think, obviously an error. Let me contact someone to confirm, then maybe contact someone to fix the problem. The FWS has a great ask a question spot. It has both helped me and not helped me in the past. In this case they didn’t help me, but it did help me. The response I received and the message I submitted is below (my information blotted out):



I applaud whoever responded. They tried to help me. They looked at what I found out and went with what they saw. They even suggested I contact another office. Well I called that office, they transferred me multiple times, eventually leading to a Mr. Olah. I think I got his answering machine, but in any case the person in charge was not available. I searched the internet and found his contact information and sent him an email. That email is below (I censored my identification information).


It is February 2017 as I type this. Maybe they still have me on the list to return my email.

Well then I had to go away from my quest for answers due to work. While away one night, I thought to look up the website again. To my surprise the site had changed! California was no longer listed. My email showed no reply from anyone, it was late April 2016 when I checked. So within 6 weeks of my email, the website was fixed! No thank you or anything for my email. Now February 2017, I show what the site looks like now: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=Q208 also pictured below.

 

No more California. Look I even helped them find Florida!

Thanks to my research, I helped the service determine and remove a federally endangered species from the State of California of the Endangered Species Act. It was unfortunately for all the school children, scientists, and government employees who were misled by the erroneous information, as I had been. Yet for future children, scientists, and government employees this information has been corrected!

Mistakes do happen. This mistake wasn’t that big of a deal. When you think of cactus, you might think of Arizona or New Mexico. Maybe even California. Florida has fewer species. Maybe they mixed cactus with cactus somewhere that originally caused the mistake. So much other information I found does appear to be correct, mistakes are way fewer. Thank you to the Service for making information publicly available. Unlike me thanking the Service, the Service has yet to thank me for helping them. I don’t care so much about credit. What I care about is helping recover endangered plant species.

Helping endangered species is a brutal fight, an uphill climb against the Service. I have asked to help the Service recover species. They tell me no. They tell me no every single time. Well so I need to make them see I can help. By showing them such an example, I hope they will listen.

This was an example I had documented. So many other, more worthy, activities I don’t have documented. Yet the Service has thwarted my efforts. The Service is only hurting itself when they ignore citizens. The current state of the Service produces a lot of bureaucracy without return of species recovery. It will take big changes. The Endangered Species Act is great and has the potential to be great. Unfortunately they have some bad people managing it. They will have to change before endangered and threatened plant species can be expected to recover. They will have to work with private citizens, not ignore and reject them.

Thank you for reading. Comment for discussion if you would like. Have a nice day!